Insider Secrets to Help You Select an Attorney

5 Secret Tips a Good Malpractice Lawyer Uses To Screen Your Case

2009-04-09T10:49:00.000-07:00

When an injured victim calls a lawyer, a good malpractice lawyer can tell in a few minutes whether there's a potential case. Here's 5 tips to clue you in to what they look for.

Most folks are unsure where to begin when calling a lawyer's office. They want to know if they have a case, but don't know what the lawyer needs to hear. Most want to come into the office to talk. Others want advice over the phone. A good medical malpractice lawyer looks for these 5 things:

(1) An ability to tell the lawyer what happened.

If the victim can't talk or has little memory of the events, then the lawyer needs to speak to a family member who might have more information.

It's ok if the victim can't recall what happened. The lawyer can usually put the pieces of the puzzle together with medical records and other witnesses. However, if the injured victim can talk but can't articulate why they think something was done wrong, proving a case becomes much more difficult.

Also, if the victim can't describe what injuries they suffered as a result of the wrongdoing, it becomes impossible to prove a successful case.

(2) An ability to listen.

Your malpractice lawyer needs to know specific information. He will ask you a series of questions that establish basic information such as "How old are you," "What do you do for a living," "What do you think the doctor did wrong," "What permanent injuries do you have from the wrongdoing," "Has any doctor criticized the care you received from your other doctors?"

There are some potential clients who keep talking and simply don't want to hear what I have to say. For those people, I know at the outset that dealing with them will be difficult.

(3) An ability to ask questions.

Most people who call a lawyer for help have never been in that situation before. That's why they're calling for help. It's natural for a victim to have questions about the legal system, legal fees, how lawsuits work, and what their chances for winning their case are. The more inquisitive they are, the better informed they'll be.

(4) The potential client who continually asks "What's my case worth?" is usually the type of person who will live for their case, as opposed to living their life. What do I mean?

There are people who live their lives and try to restore their dignity by going back to work, or improving their lives despite their disability. There are others who want to milk the system, and are content to sit home and watch TV until their lawsuit is finished.

From a lawyer's perspective, a person who makes every effort to overcome their disability tends to generate much more sympathy than someone waiting for their ticket to be punched.

(5) Is the injured victim shopping around for a lawyer?

There are some folks who jump from one lawyer to another looking for a better deal, a better lawyer, a lawyer who tells them only what they want to hear, or a lawyer who doesn't know about their other cases.

I can usually tell within minutes whether this is the case. That's ok if it is, I just want to know about it up front. A client's honesty is paramount to keeping a good working relationship. If the client isn't honest about the facts of the case, or they're hiding something from me, we'll usually find out about the inconsistency during our investigation.

If we don't, I guarantee the defense will find out about it during the lawsuit and it will definitely hurt your case.

Conclusion: Finding a good malpractice lawyer is easier if you've done your research and know what to look for in a good lawyer. Ask your potential lawyer if they have free reports and information on their web site that informs them how lawsuits work before they ever walk into a lawyer's office.

When you make that call to a malpractice lawyer, keep in mind these 5 tips, and you'll have a much smoother experience than you might otherwise have had.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

10 Misconceptions About New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers

2009-04-08T08:09:00.001-07:00

1. They like to file frivolous lawsuits.

Wrong. Filing a medical malpractice lawsuit in New York is downright difficult. A lawyer must first conduct a thorough investigation of the facts and then have all the medical records reviewed by a medical expert. Only after the expert has confirmed evidence of wrongdoing; that the wrongdoing caused injury; and that the injury is significant, can the attorney go forward and file suit.

Remember, nobody likes a frivolous lawsuit. It's bad for the lawyer, the client, the doctors, and the Court system. While there may always be differences of opinion about what happened and who is responsible for the victim's injuries, a New York Medical Malpractice lawyer is ethically prohibited from filing a lawsuit that has no merit. Besides, who wants to waste thousands of hours of their time prosecuting a case that has no merit, and spent countless amounts of money to pursue a case that doesn't belong in the Court system?

2. They sue everyone who saw the patient, even if there's no reason.

Most of the time, this is incorrect. A lawyer is ethically bound to sue only those individuals who can be directly linked to the client's injuries. Sometimes, after reading a hospital record it appears as if nurses and health care providers participated in the events that led to the client's injuries. In those cases it may be necessary to name people in the lawsuit that might be peripherally involved.

Once it becomes clear during the course of the lawsuit that certain individuals had nothing to do with the malpractice or causing injury, the patient's lawyer is likely to dismiss that person from the lawsuit- either after they have given testimony or shortly before trial.

3. They get 1/3 to 1/2 of the settlement or verdict as their fee.

Wrong. In New York the fee is less than that. In a medical malpractice case, the lawyer's fee is based on a sliding scale which is set by law. It is less than 1/3. In fact, the lawyer's fee only starts at 30% and decreases as the amount we recover for our client increases. This sliding scale has been in effect in New York since 1985, and benefits the injured client, not the lawyer.

This is how a New York malpractice lawyer calculates his fee:

(1) The expenses that the lawyer has laid out to prosecute your case gets reimbursed to the lawyer from the total settlement amount.

(2) Of the remaining amount, the lawyer's fee is calculated.

If your award is anywhere from $1 to $250,000, the lawyer's fee is only 30% of that amount.

If you are awarded anywhere from $250,001-$500,000, the lawyer's fee on that segment of the award drops now to 25%.

If you are awarded anywhere from $500,001-$750,000, the lawyer's fee for that segment drops again to 20%.

This drop in the attorney's fee continues until you achieve over $1.25 Million. Anything over $1.25 million, the attorney's fee remains at only 10%.

This fee is significantly different than in a case involving a car accident or a trip and fall. In those 'negligence' cases, the lawyer's fee in New York State is 1/3 of your award, after the expenses have been repaid to the law firm.

4. They hate doctors and hospitals.

Wrong. Most malpractice attorneys recognize that most physicians and hospital staff work hard at what they do and appreciate the patients they treat. The problems arise with those few physicians who don't practice medicine in accordance with the standards of their specialty. It's those few bad apples that are careless and cause harm to patients.

Remember, lawyers are people too. They need physicians and hospitals too, and rely on their expertise when they are ill.

5. They are responsible for increases in health care costs and the premiums that doctors pay for their malpractice insurance.

Wrong. There are many studies that have been published by well-educated and well-credentialed folks who have consistently stated that increased premiums for medical malpractice insurance have little to do with the lawyers who file malpractice lawsuits. In fact, I just read an article where Anthony Bonomo, the Chief Executive Officer of PRI - Physicians Reciprocal Insurance Company (one of two major malpractice insurance companies here in New York), confirmed that lawsuits have little to do with the rise in malpractice premiums that doctors must pay for their medical malpractice insurance policies.

Some physicians argue that they practice 'defensive medicine' in order to run tests the patient doesn't really need. They also argue that running all these tests will prevent some lawyer from later claiming that certain tests should have been done to check for medical conditions that were never considered by the doctor.

The problem with this argument is that lawyers don't dictate what treatment patients should get. The physician should be smart enough to know what possible conditions the patient may be suffering from, and order those tests that will either confirm, or rule out those possible medical problems. If the doctor doesn't know enough about the patient's condition, then he should be referring the patient to a specialist, or calling in other doctors to consult about this problem.

If you want to look at why health care costs have increased, one need only look at the compensation that health insurance executives receive and question why they are paid millions of dollars per year.

6. They're looking for a quick settlement to squeeze money from the insurance company.

False. There is no malpractice insurance company in New York that would permit themselves to be taken advantage of. The insurance companies in New York that represent doctors and hospitals hire some of the best and brightest trial lawyers in the state to represent them from the initial stages of a lawsuit all the way through trial and appeals.

Importantly, the insurance company would never allow an attorney to squeeze them for a 'quick settlement'. It simply doesn't happen. In fact, most malpractice cases here in New York are resolved only shortly before or during trial. A lawyer that thinks a malpractice claim will be resolved immediately after filing the lawsuit is naïve, and not experienced with New York malpractice claims.

7. They can settle a case without the client's consent.

Wrong. In New York, the client must consent and agree to any settlement. If the client does not agree to the settlement, then the case continues forward. A lawyer is prohibited ethically and morally from settling a medical malpractice or injury lawsuit without their client's consent.

In fact, when a lawsuit is settled, it is best done in open court, 'on the record', where a record is made of the terms of the settlement. If the settlement is done privately, there are specific legal requirements that must be set forth in the papers confirming the settlement. Otherwise, one party may have difficulty enforcing the settlement.

8. They can settle a case involving an infant if the parent consents to the settlement.

Wrong again. In New York State, any case involving an infant (a child under the age of 18 years) must be supervised and overseen by the trial court. If a settlement is agreed upon by the parties in the lawsuit, the lawyer representing the injured infant must now apply to the trial court for permission to settle that case.

The lawyer is required to explain to the judge why he believes the settlement amount is appropriate and show to the judge medical evidence of the child's injuries and evidence that the injuries are resolved or will get better over time. If the lawyer cannot support the claim that the settlement is appropriate, the trial judge will not approve the settlement, and the case will continue, regardless of the parent's belief that the settlement is a good one.

9. They take any case that walks in the door.

Wrong. It does not benefit a lawyer to accept a medical malpractice case that has little monetary value or little merit. The malpractice lawyer works just as hard on a large case as he does on a small one. The amount of money and time spent to prosecute medical malpractice cases are enormous.

These types of cases are unlike car accident cases or slip and fall cases which are must simpler to prosecute. Lawyers who regularly handle medical malpractice cases here in New York typically reject 98 out of 100 cases that walk in the door. Out of those one or two cases that are accepted for investigation, most are rejected after being reviewed by a physician. This is the screening process that good malpractice lawyers use to evaluate a case.

10. They like to go to trial.

This is often true! A New York medical malpractice lawyer must have sufficient knowledge and experience to go to trial and take a verdict if the insurance company refuses to settle the case. In that instance the lawyer has no alternative but to present his case to a jury so that a panel of impartial folks can determine whether their claims are true. If true, the jury will decide how much to award to the injured victim.

A lawyer who takes a case solely to try and obtain a settlement does the client no justice. The lawyer must be prepared from the outset to go to trial. This is the only way to achieve the best possible result for the injured client. If the insurance company knows that the lawyer is afraid to go to trial, they stand a much better chance of taking advantage of this fact and low-balling the settlement negotiations and staying low.

When a case goes to trial, it means that both sides run the risk of losing. The question always is which side is going to blink first and recognize that settling the case is a better business decision than a jury verdict that could far outstrip what they felt the case was worth.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski